The netbook, tested with our reference monitor Dell WFp, only provided a sufficient image quality in this resolution. So, the reason can actually only be found in the power consumption. The Wind UUS is a much better value. The maximum volume is restricted, the sound everything else than worth hearing. The screen subjectively makes a good impression even at rendering pictures. The netbook has basically taken a step toward Asus’ Eee PC. Also, the Wind screen has a matte finish which I prefer, but opinions vary , the Acer screen is glossy.
|Date Added:||7 June 2012|
|File Size:||31.31 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Eee is always a few seconds faster in each runthrough, which however can’t really be determined subjectively in the performance of both netbooks. Usually single drivers e. Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit. Don’t show this again.
Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. The netbook, tested with our reference monitor Dell WFp, only provided a sufficient image quality in this resolution.
For one thing, it has a inch screen versus only 9 inches for the Acer Aspire One. It’s necessary to remark the good case stability as touchhpad as the very pleasant to use keyboard. It’s recommendable to consider the position to the sun and if required, to look for a shadowy place.
MSI builds in a 1. We weren’t quite as happy with the VGA porteither. Merely the CPU use turned out a bit high with 8.
It must be new there too as there aren’t yet any customer reviews. The Asus is much lower with 4.
The screen achieves winf maximum possible ratio of The Wind U almost achieves the manfacturer’s stated top value of minutes or 7 hours in the BatteryEater Reader’s test, representative of the maximum runtime at reading a document energy saving mode, min. The Wind U completely omits hot keys.
Review MSI Wind U Netbook – Reviews
Overall, an immense savings advantage remains anyway. The evidently ever-increasing fashion of chiclet design for the keyboard is also very striking.
If you’re in the market for a Netbook, it’s a worthwhile read. Checking the system latencies showed deflections in the possibly critical field every now and again. The audio netbooj output over the headphone socket turns out a lot better, even if the exact opposite in terms of sound way too muffled, subjectively. A comparatively good viewing angle stability, good rates and a subjectively brilliant color representation speak for the screen, at least as long as you’re indoors.
Get an MSI Wind Netbook for only $ – CNET
Please, switch off ad blockers. The case has been dipped completely in high-glosswith exception of the base tray, and all plastic components in the wrist-rest area will from now on be designed chaste and without any structure.
The keys have a comparatively short stroke length and a very distinct pressure point. It isn’t obtrusive with It can only be twisted with difficulty, which allows for a picking up of the netbook at its display edge without problems. We didn’t notice multi-touch support just as little as a horizontal or vertical scroll area.
The MSI Wind U seems not to be able to translate this, as it can be observed, and above all heard, that the fan runs permanently even without load. If watching netbool resolution videos is of special interest, Ion ranges should be favored as the integrated Geforce M G graphic card can support the Atom CPU significantly here. See a summary of all my Defensive Computing touchpda.
This is a feasible rate but still lags far behind the identically equipped Asus Eee p.
They gleam in intensive colors on the display. Last month Liliputing ran a detailed comparison of the two machines. Our Verdict This laptop has everything a netbook is expected to have, ticking all the right boxes.